OnNoncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http:creativecommons.orglicensesbync3.0), permitting all noncommercial use, distribution
OnNoncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http:creativecommons.orglicensesbync3.0), permitting all noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, supplied the original function is adequately cited. Citation: Int J Qualitative Stud Health Wellbeing 200, five: 4654 DOI: 0.3402qhw.v5i.(web page number not for citation objective)S. Hauge M. Kirkevold conceptualizations on the term, both in each day language and in the analysis literature. Inside the classical study literature on loneliness, there are actually two substantially various definitions and descriptions of the idea. Karnick (2005) and Mijuskovic (979) view loneliness as a normal, universal, and existential phenomenon relevant for all human beings, with each positive and unfavorable connotations. In contrast, Weiss, Riesman, and Bowlby (973) describe loneliness as an abnormal, and solely damaging feeling related to social and emotional isolation. These diverse understandings of loneliness mirror the conceptual diversity discussed in various theoretical analyses of the concept (de Jong Gierveld, 998; Donaldson Watson, 996; Karnick, 2005; Nilsson, Lindstrom, Naden, 2006; Weeks, 994). For example, Karnick (2005) claims that loneliness “is deemed optimistic when it is viewed as creative, productive and maturing, and as damaging when it truly is defined as physical, emotional or social alienation, or isolation from PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24951279 self or other” (p. 9). Even though the idea of “positive loneliness” is applied in some publications (Dahlberg, 2007; Karnick, 2005; Nilsson et al 2006; Routasalo Pitkala, 2003; Tornstam, 990), in most situations loneliness is interpreted as a term applied to describe a unfavorable and unpleasant state. Additionally, there is also confusion in the literature with regard to the truth that the terms “loneliness,” “being alone,” and “living alone” are used interchangeably (Davies, 996; Karnick, 2005; Routasalo Pitkala, 2003), and that loneliness is even utilized as a term to describe depression (Barg et al 2006). Furthermore, the concept of solitude, usually order amyloid P-IN-1 employed to describe a positive state (Long, Seburn, Averill, More, 2003), is in some circumstances used to describe a damaging state (Extended et al 2003; Moustakas, 972; Pilkington, 2005). In response towards the confusing use of the terms, attempts happen to be made to describe loneliness, and the partnership amongst loneliness as well as other related concepts, along a continuum (Killeen, 998; Younger, 995). Killeen (998) has proposed a continuum which ranges from alienation to connectedness. In his analysis, loneliness is reserved to get a smaller a 
part of the continuum and is differentiated in the a lot more unfavorable state of alienation, and in the much more optimistic state of social isolation. Based on Killeen (998), social isolation may be interpreted as something much less painful than loneliness. Offered the prevalence of loneliness amongst older men and women along with the lack of clarity inside the literature in regards to the phenomenon, more study about how older folks fully grasp loneliness is expected. Such know-how could help us address loneliness inside a extra informed way. This study was performed to address this situation. Methods This was a qualitative interview study conducted within a hermeneutic interpretive tradition (Fleming, Gaidys, Robb, 2003; Gadamer, 2004; Kvale, 2007). In line with Gadamer (2004), researchers’ preunderstanding can be a vital a part of a study’s interpretative foundations. Our preunderstanding was colored by the literature overview above. In specific, we assumed.